Warren County Republican Committee

P.O. Box 2020, Front Royal, Virginia 22630

 
  HOME
  This week in Washington
  RPV Weekly Update October 9th, 2009
  HEALTH CARE
  Deeds vs McDonnell Debate
  Officers & Chairs
  Download Documents
  Republican Creed
  Calendar
  Volunteer
  Links
  Contact
  Basic Principles
  We Are a Judeo Christian Nation
  Bob McDonnell for GOVERNOR
  Bill Bolling for LT. GOVERNOR
  Cuccinelli for ATTORNEY GENERAL
  RPV Convention - Adnan Barqawi
 
Sign up for email updates
First Name:

Last Name:

Email :

Welcome to WarrenGOP.org!

Email info@warrengop.org with questions.

  CONGRATULATIONS TO SCOTT BROWN (R) WHO HAS WON THE SPECIAL ELECTION FOR THE MASSACHUSETTS SENATE SEAT.

 

THERE WILL BE NO WARREN COUNTY REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE MEETING IN JANUARY.

 

MONTHLY MEETINGS WILL RESUME IN FEBRUARY - THE 3RD THURSDAY OF THE MONTH AT THE WARREN COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER - Registration and sign in from 6pm - meeting starts at 7pm.

 

For Immediate Release

November 12, 2009

Contact: Dan Scandling

Jennifer Allen

(202) 225-5136

 

WOLF AGAIN ASKS ADMINISTRATION NOT TO SEND

GUANTANAMO DETAINEES BACK TO YEMEN

Sends Fourth Letter Since October 1; Also Asks That Information on Detainees Be Made Public

 

            Washington, D.C. – Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) is again asking the Obama Administration to rethink its plans to release Guantanamo Bay detainees back to Yemen, particularly in light of the recent tragedy at Fort Hood where the alleged shooter reportedly has ties to a radical cleric now living in Yemen.

 

            In a letter today to the president, Wolf implored the administration not to send any more detainees back to Yemen, or any other unstable country.  He also requested that fact sheets and threat assessments on each detainee cleared for release be made public. 

 

            “The American people have a right to know who these detainees are and what acts of terror they were engaged in,” Wolf wrote.  “If the public had this information, they would never tolerate the release of these men back to unstable countries with a sizeable al Qaeda presence.”

 

            This is the fourth time since October 1 that Wolf has asked the Obama Administration to rethink its position on sending detainees to Yemen.

 

            “If the administration does not halt these pending releases immediately, it could be responsible for creating a new revolving door of terrorism that will cost American lives,” Wolf wrote today.  “The security of the American people could be at risk because of the administration’s relentless pursuit of a campaign promise to close Guantanamo Bay by January 22, 2010.”  

 

“Why has the administration made basic information about these dangerous detainees so highly classified that it cannot be shared with the American people or the media?” Wolf asked.  “I have reviewed the materials.  These are dangerous individuals.  To release committed al Qaeda terrorists back to Yemen under these conditions would be an act of gross malfeasance that undermines the safety of the American people.”

 

            Wolf, the top Republican on the House Appropriations Subcommittee that funds the Justice Department and the author of the language that created the National Commission on Terrorism in 1998, has repeatedly pointed to the deteriorating security situation in Yemen as cause for concern.  He also cited recent media reports of a foiled terrorist attack in Saudi Arabia where one of the alleged terrorists was a former Guantanamo detainee who entered the country from Yemen.       

 

            In addition, Wolf pointed to recent comments by the director of the National Counterterrorism Center, Micheal Leiter, who in an interview with Voice of America said:  “In Yemen, we have witnessed the reemergence of al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula and the possibility that that will become the base of operations for al-Qaida.” 

 

            In today’s letter, Wolf also raised concerns about Anwar al-Aulaqi, the radical cleric now living in Yemen who has ties to Fort Hood gunman Major Nidal M. Hasan and also mentored two of the 9/11 hijackers.

 

“As the facts surrounding the Fort Hood attack have emerged, it is becoming clear that anyone who is cited in the 9/11 Commission Report -- as al-Aulaqi was on page 221 -- as a ‘significant’ contact for 9/11 terrorists Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar should be considered a ‘significant’ connection to Hasan,” Wolf wrote.  “Al-Aulaqi has subsequently praised Hasan’s attack stating on his Web site: ‘Nidal Hassan is a hero... Nidal opened fire on soldiers who were on their way to be deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. How can there be any dispute about the virtue of what he has done? In fact the only way a Muslim could Islamically justify serving as a soldier in the US army is if his intention is to follow the footsteps of men like Nidal,’’’ according to a translation.   

 

            “The American people deserve a full accounting of al-Aulaqi’s relationship with Hasan and his incitement of terrorism in Yemen,” Wolf continued.  “Since fleeing to Yemen in 2004, al-Aulaqi has taught his radical ideology at the Iman University in Sanaa, Yemen -- the same university attended by convicted terrorist John Walker Lindh.  In 2002, the university was temporarily closed following a deadly attack by one of its students on three American citizens in Yemen.  If al-Aulaqi were able to have this impact on a U.S. Army major at Walter Reed Army Medical Center and Fort Hood, what impact will he have on the newly freed detainees in Yemen? ’’

 

            Below is the complete text of Wolf’s letter today to the president.  His earlier letters are available online at wolf.house.gov/oversight.

 

                                                                                    November 12, 2009

 

 

The Honorable Barack H. Obama

The President

The White House

Washington DC 20500

 

Dear Mr. President:

 

As the author of the language that created the National Commission on Terrorism in 1998 and the ranking Republican on the House Appropriations subcommittee with oversight authority for the Justice Department, I remain deeply concerned about the administration’s imminent release of as many as 26 Guantanamo Bay detainees to Yemen -- a growing haven for al Qaeda in the Persian Gulf.  It is my understanding that you are also preparing to release several other detainees to another country that anyone with a basic understanding of world affairs would agree is unacceptable. 

 

The American people have the right to know who these detainees are and what acts of terror they were engaged in.  If the public had this information, they would never tolerate the release of these men back into unstable countries with a sizeable al Qaeda presence. 

 

If the administration does not halt these pending releases immediately, it could be responsible for creating a new revolving door of terrorism that will cost American lives.  The security of the American people could be at risk because of your administration’s relentless pursuit of a campaign promise to close Guantanamo Bay by January 22, 2010.  

 

Why has the administration made basic information about these dangerous detainees so highly classified that it cannot be shared with the American people or the media?  I have reviewed the materials.  These are dangerous individuals.  To release committed al Qaeda terrorists back to Yemen under these conditions would be an act of gross malfeasance that undermines the safety of the American people.

 

Earlier this year, I offered an amendment to the fiscal year 2009 supplemental appropriations bill requiring the administration to provide unclassified fact sheets and threat analyses of any Guantanamo detainees scheduled for release.  The American people have the right to this information, which has direct implications on the safety of our military and civilians.  The amendment was defeated by a partisan vote thus allowing your administration to operate under a cloak of secrecy to empty Guantanamo Bay. 

 

You receive intelligence briefings daily and must know that Yemen is undoubtedly one of the most unstable countries in the world today -- and the country where al Qaeda has reconstituted its operations over the last year.  The director of the National Counterterrorism Center, Michael Leiter, stated last month in a Voice of America interview, “In Yemen, we have witnessed the reemergence of al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula and the possibility that that will become the base of operations for al-Qaida.”  His sentiment is shared by United Nations sanctions coordinator Richard Barrett who indicated that few places in the world provide a more perfect safe haven to al Qaeda than Yemen. 

 

Instances of former Guantanamo Bay detainees launching terrorist attacks from Yemen include one just a month ago.  On October 13, Saudi police prevented an imminent suicide bomb attack as two al Qaeda terrorists slipped across the border from Yemen.  Notably, one of the would-be suicide bombers, Yousef Mohammed al Shihri, was a former Guantanamo detainee released in 2007 to Saudi Arabia.  He quickly left Saudi Arabia for dangerously unstable Yemen where he rejoined al Qaeda. 

 

Just over a year ago, in September 2008, another former Guantanamo Bay detainee, Said Ali al Shihri, helped orchestrate the terrorist attack on the U.S. embassy in Sanaa, Yemen, killing 10 guards and civilians. Since that time, al Qaeda's posture in Yemen has grown stronger with the merger of the Saudi and Yemeni arms of al Qaeda into one group--al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula--with Yemen as its base for training and operations.

 

Yemen is also now home to radical cleric Anwar al-Aulaqi, who influenced alleged Fort Hood gunman Major Nidal M. Hasan.  As you may recall, al-Aulaqi mentored two of the 9/11 hijackers before fleeing to Yemen in 2004.  He is believed by U.S. intelligence to be a critical link in al Qaeda’s efforts to radicalize Muslim Americans and incite domestic terrorist acts.  According to one expert cited in a 2008 Washington Post article, “Aulaqi is ‘a huge inspiration to home-grown terror cells in the U.K. and Europe.’” 

 

As the facts surrounding the Fort Hood attack have emerged, it is becoming clear that anyone who is cited in the 9/11 Commission Report -- as al-Aulaqi was on page 221 -- as a “significant” contact for 9/11 terrorists Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar should be considered a “significant” connection to Hasan.  Al-Aulaqi has subsequently praised Hasan’s attack stating on his Web site: “Nidal Hassan is a hero... Nidal opened fire on soldiers who were on their way to be deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. How can there be any dispute about the virtue of what he has done? In fact the only way a Muslim could Islamically justify serving as a soldier in the US army is if his intention is to follow the footsteps of men like Nidal,” according to a translation.   

 

            The American people deserve a full accounting of al-Aulaqi’s relationship with Hasan and his incitement of terrorism in Yemen.  Since fleeing to Yemen in 2004, al-Aulaqi has taught his radical ideology at the Iman University in Sanaa, Yemen -- the same university attended by convicted terrorist John Walker Lindh.  In 2002, the university was temporarily closed following a deadly attack by one of its students on three American citizens in Yemen.  If al-Aulaqi were able to have this impact on a U.S. Army major at Walter Reed Army Medical Center and Fort Hood, what impact will he have on the newly freed detainees in Yemen? 

 

Iman University’s founder, Abd-al-Majid al Zindani, is a long-standing ally of Osama bin Laden and was designated by the U.S. Treasury Department in 2004 as a “specially designated global terrorist.”  However, the Yemeni government has refused to turn over Zindani to U.S. authorities amid speculation that President Salih is protecting him for political purposes.  If the Yemeni government is obstructing the arrest of high-profile terrorist financiers like Zindani, how can we trust that they would even attempt to rehabilitate or monitor detainees released from Guantanamo Bay?

 

            You were at Fort Hood on Tuesday for the memorial service.  You saw the grief-stricken families of those who died.  You saw the heartbreak of innocent children who will grow up without a parent, the gut-wrenching sorrow of spouses who are left to carry on alone, the tears of mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, aunts and uncles of the fallen soldiers. 

 

            I raise these concerns directly with you because, according to everyone with whom I have spoken, detainee transfers and releases are being run directly out of the White House.  Setting aside the obvious concerns about politicization of the National Security Council (NSC), it is clear that your consolidation of operational authority within the NSC could certainly be viewed as an attempt to thwart congressional oversight and exert greater political control over the process, as reflected in instructions not to inform Congress about the effort to release Uyghur detainees into the U.S. earlier this year. 

 

In my May 1 letter to you -- to which I am still awaiting your response -- I expressed my ardent opposition to the transfer of any Uyghur detainees from Guantanamo Bay to northern Virginia.  The planned-transfer was ultimately scrapped over congressional objections, including mine.  It should be noted that according to the New York Daily News, the Dar al-Hijrah mosque where Major Hasan first encountered Anwar al-Aulaqi, “is directly across the street from a residence where a half-dozen Turkmen Muslims known as Uighurs were slated to be relocated from Guantanamo Bay, according to a law enforcement source. Lawmakers scuttled the plan.”  Had I not been informed about the NSC effort to release the Uyghur detainees into the U.S., your NSC would have completed the release without ever informing a member of Congress or the American people. 

I raised these concerns as well in my November 2 letter to you.  To date, I have not received a reply to either of these letters nor to my letters dated March 13, April 23, May 13, July 7, July 10, October 1, and November 2 to your attorney general on these matters.  This is disappointing.  Why is the administration not answering the legitimate questions of the American people?

In closing, I implore you to immediately halt the release of detainees to Yemen and other unstable countries.  If the administration is intent, however, on proceeding with the release of detainees, it has an obligation to provide the American people with fact sheets and threat assessments for each and every detainee who leaves Guantanamo. 

            Best wishes.

 

                                                            Sincerely,

 

 

                                                            Frank R. Wolf

                                                Member of Congress

 

 

 

 

Watch the Video Highlighting the Lowlights of Deeds' Campaign. 

RPV Logo- Small

www.rpv.org

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                 

October 14, 2009

Contact: Tim Murtaugh
(804) 780-0111
tmurtaugh@rpv.org

Wagner On Deeds' Gas Tax Increase: "Bring it On!"

- Declares She Would Raise Other Taxes as Well -

RICHMOND - Democratic candidate for lieutenant governor Jody Wagner has made it clear that she will stand firmly with Creigh Deeds in his quest to raise gas taxes by $1 billion to pay for an undeclared transportation plan, and in fact goes further, expressing the view that she believes even more financial hardships on taxpayers are needed.  At a campaign event in Fairfax this week, Wagner appeared with Del. Vivian Watts, a former Secretary of Transportation, who agreed that heaping new taxes on the people is "responsible."

20-Cents-a-Gallon Gas Tax Increase: "Bring it On!"

"At the Democratic Club meeting in Fairfax County's Greenspring Village retirement community, there was no hemming and hawing Tuesday about whether Virginia should boost the gas tax to fix Northern Virginia's roads," reported the Washington Post.

"From the mouths of lieutenant governor candidate Jody Wagner, fellow Democrat Del. Vivian E. Watts, and several folks in the audience, the message was: Bring it on."

            Deeds has pledged to raise taxes by $4 billion over his four years as governor - if elected - to pay for transportation improvements he has yet to identify.  A one-cent increase in the gas tax generates approximately $50 million in revenue, meaning to reach $1 billion annually at least a 20-cent increase is required.  Wagner has been clear in her stated support for Deeds' plan.

"The day after I'm elected governor, I'm gonna start assembling a bipartisan commission," Deeds said in a debate with Republican Bob McDonnell this week.  "If that commission comes forward with a plan to raise new revenue ... I will sign it."

"[Wagner Campaign Manager Elizabeth Pearson] said, ‘Jody is looking forward to working with Governor Deeds to provide a long-term solution to transportation funding.'" (Washington Post)

But Wait, There's More!

            Wagner extended her startling position on higher taxes even beyond the tax on gasoline.  Because of diminishing returns due to more fuel-efficient cars, the Democrats will look to ever growing funding sources in the near future.

... the thrust of her remarks suggested that she believes not only that higher gas taxes must be part of a long-term solution, but that other new revenues might also be necessary.

"Whatever we do, we've got to make sure it's tied to usage in some fashion," Wagner said. "It needs to fall on people that are use the transportation system. Second, it needs to be broad-based in its application. And, third, it has to be sustainable."

Citing her own switch from a vehicle that got 20 miles per gallon to one that now gets nearly 50, Wagner said the nation's motorists are shifting toward more fuel-efficient vehicles, thereby reducing the amount raised by gas taxes.

"It is not the ultimate panacea we would like to think it is," Wagner said. "So, ultimately, that is not the ultimate solution. It may be a bridge. But, ultimately, we're going to have to be more diverse in the way we handle it because people are going to start moving away from gasoline."

Watts, meanwhile, said she thought Deeds "was extremely responsible" when he pledged to find new revenue for transportation.

Wagner's High-Tax History

Wagner has supported every major tax increase over the past eight years:

2004 - Sales and Use Tax (HB 5018)

2004 - Cigarette Tax (HB 5018)

2004 - Elimination of Tax deductions for seniors (HB 5018)

2004 - Recordation Tax (HB 5018)

2004 - 20-percent increase in the sales tax (HB30)

2004 - Car Tax Cap (HB 5018)

2006 - Car Titling Tax (HB 1611)

2006 - Vehicle Insurance Tax (HB 1613)

2006 - Registration Fee Increase (HB 1614)

2007 - Car Titling Tax (HB 2071)

2007 - Registration and Heavy Truck Fees (HB 3152)

2008 - (Special Session) - 1% increase on car titling tax, $10 increase on car registration, 1% increase in Sales Tax in Northern Virginia & Hampton Roads, 25 cent increase in Grantor Tax (HB 6026)

Republican Party of Virginia
115 East Grace Street
Richmond, VA 23219
www.rpv.org
804-780-0111

Paid for and authorized by the Republican Party of Virginia

RPV Logo- Small

www.rpv.org

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                 

October 13, 2009

Contact: Tim Murtaugh
(804) 780-0111
tmurtaugh@rpv.org

Deeds Contradicts Self on Taxes, Transportation in 3rd Debate

- Denies Supporting Tax Increases, Says "I Will Sign" Bill that Does Just That -

- Desperate Democrat Stays on Negative Attack, Uses the Word "Lie" Twice -

RICHMOND - A trailing and negative Democratic candidate for governor Creigh Deeds used personal insults twice during a debate with Republican Bob McDonnell while once again obfuscating, yet telegraphing his plan to raise taxes by $1 billion.  In the third debate with his Republican opponent Bob McDonnell sponsored by WCVE (PBS), the AARP and the League of Women Voters, Deeds denied proposing a massive tax increase while he simultaneously pledged to sign a bill that does exactly that.  Deeds, who is running television ads that are of a ratio of 2:1 negative to positive, twice used the word "lie" in frustration during a debate marked by his confusing answers and erratic versions of statements.

            "I have not proposed a billion dollars in tax increases," Deeds told moderator Judy Woodruff and a television audience across Virginia.

            Moments later Deeds exposed his obfuscation and took a bazooka to his own claim to have any semblance of a detailed plan.

            "The day after I'm elected governor, I'm gonna start assembling a bipartisan commission," Deeds said.  "If that commission comes forward with a plan to raise new revenue ... I will sign it." 

To Be Clear Creigh ... You Set Your Revenue Goal ...

"We have a need that exceeds a billion dollars a year.  We have to come up with a billion dollars a year of new money.  And to arrive at that, everything is on the table."  (Creigh Deeds, Following the Fairfax Chamber of Commerce Debate, September 17, 2009)

And Explained How You'll Get It:

"R.CREIGH DEEDS, the Democrat running for governor in Virginia, has now unequivocally committed himself to support higher taxes," wrote the Washington Post

Republican Party of Virginia
115 East Grace Street
Richmond, VA 23219
www.rpv.org
804-780-0111

Paid for and authorized by the Republican Party of Virginia

RPV Logo- Small

www.rpv.org

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                 

October 10, 2009

Contact: Tim Murtaugh
(804) 780-0111
tmurtaugh@rpv.org

Deeds: I have a Transportation Plan

Fairfax Democrats: No You Don't

- Deeds' Fairfax Volunteers Craft New Message In Lieu of Real One -

RICHMOND - Frustrated by the incompetence of Creigh Deeds' campaign for governor of Virginia, the City of Fairfax Democratic Committee has decided to substitute its own version of Deeds campaign literature rather than use that supplied by the Deeds campaign itself, if the Fairfax Committee and the liberal blog Blue Commonwealth are to be believed.  In the stand-in hand cards, the verbiage is the same as what the people of Virginia hear from Creigh Deeds: he has no real plan for transportation, but will "craft" one if he is elected.

Witness this post from Friday on Blue Commonwealth:

The City of Fairfax Democratic Committee has produced its own hand card of talking points for Creigh Deeds.  The joint effort is being printed and distributed for use in door knocking and conversations (like in the grocery store, for example).  The Committee, dissatisfied with the hand cards and flyers offered by the campaign, put their heads together and the following is the result.

Deeds: No Roads Plan - Fairfax Dems Forced to Wing It

The new-and-improved hand card includes this prompt for Deeds and Democratic grassroots workers to employ to harass their neighbors while shopping:

* Transportation: [Deeds] Will assemble a bipartisan commission to craft a comprehensive transportation plan

            This vague promise of gathering people at a table to assess what is on the table, while everything is on the table is exactly the sort of gobbledygook Deeds spouts on most occasions.

"Deeds has pledged to come up with a solution in his first year in office but has offered no details," opined the Washington Post.

            Deeds fairly well derailed earlier this week on WTOP-AM in Washington, DC, when he was asked by host Mark Plotkin about the very topic of transportation.

Audio Can be Found by Clicking Here.

Plotkin's first question on transportation could not have been more damning to Deeds:

Plotkin: Why do you think you're getting so much trouble about this issue?  And you're accused of being duplicitous, disingenuous, fuzzy.  Why don't you clarify where you are on transportation taxes, and why don't you just come right out and say, "look, the revenue needs are so great, this is the only way it could be done?"  Or, is it just because candidates for political office never say during a campaign they're gonna raise taxes?

Cue: Deeds' Non-Answer Answer

            Deeds' reply, was as always, as clear as mud as he attempted to answer the question without - you know - actually answering the question:

Traffic ... transportation right now is what separates us in Virginia from the economy we have and the economy we want.  If we are to continue to grow prosperity where it exists, and if we're gonna grow prosperity where it doesn't exist across Virginia, we've got to address transportation, we've got to have an honest, open discussion about it.  I had an op-ed in the Washington Post a couple of weeks ago that I think ... I tried to clarify my position with respect to transportation.  The only approach that's worked on transportation in the last thirty years is the approach employed by Governor Baliles in 1986 and that's the approach I'm gonna take.  Everything to fix transportation is on the table.  And I want to bring everybody to the table to bring ... to create that solution.  And I'm gonna do it next year.  Everything's on the table that has a nexus to transportation.

Everybody Got That?  Everything's On the Table.

            "For the record, Creigh Deeds used the two-word phrase ‘the table' fourteen times in the eleven-and-a-half minutes he talked about transportation in that WTOP interview - that's an average of more than once every minute," said Republican Party of Virginia Chairman Pat Mullins.  "Apparently, he's a big fan of what's on the table, who's at the table ... various things about tables.  I'll tell you what people talk about around tables, and that's pocketbook issues, and Creigh Deeds means to raid those pocketbooks to pay for his undeclared roads plan."

Entire Transcript of Deeds' Comments on Roads on WTOP Here.

Republican Party of Virginia
115 East Grace Street
Richmond, VA 23219
www.rpv.org
804-780-0111

Paid for and authorized by the Republican Party of Virginia 

 

 

 

RPV Logo- Small

www.rpv.org

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                 

October 7, 2009

Democrats In Disarray: Obama Keeping Distance, While Deeds Blames POTUS 

- White House Backs Off Virginia Race; Deeds Blames DC for Own Woes -

- Negative Campaign, Sagging Polls Draw Skepticism from POTUS, Moran & Kaine -

 RICHMOND - President Barack Obama is strongly hinting at letting Democratic candidate for governor Creigh Deeds sink on his own, while Deeds is blaming the president's unpopular policies for his own campaign troubles.  Running an increasingly negative campaign, Deeds is still struggling to make a coherent argument to the voters of Virginia and has apparently frustrated leaders of his own political party: Obama, Rep. Jim Moran and Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine.

White House: Creigh Who?

            "The White House is stepping back from lending its heft to a bellwether gubernatorial race in Virginia, party strategists say, seeking to conserve its political capital and avoid close association with a candidate who might lose," reported the Wall Street Journal.  "After one appearance earlier this year, Mr. Obama hasn't committed to any further engagements in the state, despite repeated requests by the campaign of Virginia state Senator Creigh Deeds.  Mr. Obama will make a second appearance on behalf of New Jersey Democratic incumbent Jon Corzine, on a date yet to be announced."

"‘They're looking at movement in the polls and calculating how far out in this race they want to see the president go,' said a Democratic strategist involved in both races. ‘In New Jersey the path to victory is a little clearer, but I think in both cases they're making the calculation on how much of the win or the loss are they willing to own.'"

Deeds: "It's Not My Fault"

"Virginia gubernatorial candidate Creigh Deeds, a Democrat, argued Tuesday that the Obama administration's contentious economic agenda has been a drag on his campaign," reported CNN.  "With slightly under a month to go until Election Day on November 3, Deeds trails Republican Bob McDonnell in the polls. McDonnell has tried to tie Deeds to some of the more controversial legislative items being debated in Washington, particularly health care reform and the union-friendly Employee Free Choice Act.

"‘Frankly, a lot of what's going on in Washington has made it very tough,' Deeds said in a candidate forum put on by Politico, WJLA television, Google and YouTube.  ‘We had a very tough August because people were just uncomfortable with the spending.  They were uncomfortable with a lot of the noise that was coming out of Washington, D.C.'"

Kaine & Moran: "Oh, Yes It Is!"

            "[I]t's time for Deeds to make his case to Virginia voters, Gov. Timothy M. Kaine said yesterday," according to the Richmond Times-Dispatch.  ‘... now it is up to Creigh in the late innings to make the simple sell for himself.'"

            This advice comes on the heels of similar observations about Deeds' negative campaign by Rep. Jim Moran (8th District) - brother of Brian Moran, who was one of Deeds' opponent in the Democratic gubernatorial primary and was widely thought to have run an excessively negative campaign. 

            "[Rep. Moran] says he counseled his party's nominee last night that he needs to push back against consultant advice to run negative ads, and run positive spots instead," reported the Washington Post. 

            "‘We had a conversation last night,' Moran said. ‘I said: ‘All your consultants are going to tell you to go negative, just like they told my brother.  And spend all your money on negative because positive ads don't move anything.'"

Editorials Agree: Deeds is "Dirty" Campaigner

            Deeds has indeed run one of the most negative campaigns in Virginia history, as evidenced by an unprecedented nine separate editorials excoriating his campaign for its tactics and dishonesty.

            The Republican Party of Virginia has even produced a video highlighting the lowlights of the Deeds campaign.

            "I don't know how Creigh Deeds can sleep at night knowing what kind of campaign he's been running," said Republican Party of Virginia Chairman Pat Mullins.  "It's his own fault that he's sort of a man without a country right now.  The president doesn't want to be near him.  Deeds blames the president.  Tim Kaine and Jim Moran are publicly noting how bad his campaign has been.  It's wonder the poor guy can show his face in public anymore."

 Republican Party of Virginia

Paid for and authorized by the Republican Party of Virginia

Are you concerned about the current Health Care Reform Bill (HR3200) under consideration in the House of Representatives? Please read a report published by The Liberty Counsel from the original report authored by Peter Fleckenstein and posted on FreeRepublic.com - PLEASE CLICK ON THE "HEALTH CARE" tab to the left ! 

Want to read the entire text of the bill you can do so at this link. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_bills&docid=f:h3200ih.txt.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Paid for and authorized by the Warren County (Va.) Republican Committee