FOR TEXT, SCROLL DOWN
GOPUSA ILLINOIS Questions - Dave Diersenwww.gopillinois.com-- Which candidate has best chance to defeat Durbin in 2008?-- On January 13, the IRP SCC voted to prohibit the Republican Assembly of Lake County's (RALC) from using "Republican" in its name because the IRP SCC disapproved of RALC's actions. Does the IRP SCC disapprove of George Ryan's and his supporters' actions? Why hasn't the IRP SCC voted to prohibit George Ryan and his supporters from calling themselves Republicans? -- The IRP says it wants conservative voters, that is, voters who support the IRP platform, back in the party, but actions speak louder than words. Arguably, the RALC does more to help candidates who support the IRP platform than any other organization in Illinois. When will the IRP SCC reverse its January 13 vote, apologize to the RALC, and apologize to each and every RALC member?-- When will the IRP issue a press release on what happened at the January 13 IRP SCC meeting? Which IRP SCC members voted for the motion that asks Kjellander to resign and which voted against it?-- Kjellander rejects the IRP SCC call for him to resign, says he has "done absolutely nothing wrong," says his critics are "disgruntled," and says he is being made into a "scapegoat." Did the Republican National Committee make Kjellander the Treasurer of its 2008 convention? If Kjellander continues to refuse to resign as IRP National Committeeman, what should the next step be? If/when Kjellander resigns, who would be the best person to fill the vacancy and why?-- To what extent is Kjellander using his influence to reward his supporters and to punish his critics?-- What should the IRP SCC do to discourage Republican candidates, Republican elected officials, and especially Republican party leaders from praising Democrat candidates, Democrat elected officials, and Democrat party leaders, especially from praising extremely liberal Democrats like Obama?
What saddens, de-motivates, and/or irritates Illinois "Platform" Republicans more? - Dave Diersenwww.gopillinois.com-- The IRP's efforts to punish the RALC, and therefore, to punish RALC's members-- The IRP's failure do more to encourage Kjellander to resign-- The punishment and/or demonization of those who come to RALC's defense and/or call for Kjellander to resign-- Republican candidates, elected officials, and party leaders who praise Obama and/or publicly reject the IRP platform
That liability translates to roughly $8,800 owed by every man, woman and child in Illinois.
The biggest part of this crushing debt is the $41 billion we owe for pension benefits for teachers, university faculty and staff, and other state employees.
To avert or minimize this financial implosion that could cut funds for our elementary schools, cause universities to raise tuition even higher, threaten our public safety and the security of our prisons, we need to take difficult steps today. If we don't, the state's bills will continue to grow.
Just as with our own credit card bills, the longer you wait to pay, the bigger the bill becomes with added interest. but there is a big difference between your family's credit card and the state's borrowing: You and your family will be stuck with your bills, while Gov. Blagojevich and his allies won't be around to pay the state's bills later. Your children and grandchildren, however, will be.
As the ranking Republican spokesman on the Senate's pension committee, I have battled the administration's actions that have jeopardized our financial security by putting off funding for pensions. The governor's most fiscally irresponsible pension scheme allowed the state to forgo $2.3 billion in payments to the pension funds in 2006 and 2007. This pension raid allowed the governor to "live large" with a bigger budget for a couple of years, but eventually that bill -- plus lost interest -- will come due.
It's clear that the pension raid that allowed the recent spending spree is coming back to haunt us already, with steep pension funding increases required in each of the next few years. Under current law, our pension payments grow by more than $600 million from this year to next.
Some would argue that the answer would be to cut our pension benefits for teachers and other state employees. But, it's hardly fair to teachers to force them to pay for the governor's excess spending out of their retirement funds, and the Illinois Constitution won't allow us to cut benefits for people now in our state pension plans.
Fixing the problem will require some difficult decisions, but I believe it can be done. I am introducing legislation to begin to resolve the problem by establishing a new pension plan for all newly hired teachers and state employees.
The new plan would be a ''defined contribution'' plan, similar to the 401(k) plans offered by many private businesses. This new plan would replace the existing ''defined benefit'' plan that guarantees retirees a lifelong annual benefit equal to a certain percentage of their final salary. Under a defined contribution plan, both employee and the state would contribute a set percentage of salary to the employee's account, and the account would be invested at the direction of the employee. Upon retirement, the employee would enjoy the final account balance.
My idea is backed by the Civic Committee of the Commercial Club of Chicago, which is the business group predicting our financial implosion, and I am certain that taxpayers will support this idea as well.
Other legislators and civic leaders may have other ideas to reduce our pension bills, and I am eager to work with them to craft a solution. What we cannot do is simply continue to spend like tomorrow never comes.
NAPERVILLE SUN
Supreme Court justice's daughter charged with drunken driving - Nick Fawellhttp://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/napervillesun/news/258127,6_1_NA15_DUI_S1.article
Ann S. Banaszewski, 45, a Wheaton resident, was arrested at about 7:30 p.m. Monday at Gamon Road and Longfellow Drive after a witness reported seeing a possible drunk driver near 2030 S. Naperville Road, according to a police statement.
Banaszewski's three children also were in the car, a 1996 Ford Econoline van. At her request, the children were dropped off by police at a family friend's home while Banaszewski was taken into custody, Wheaton Deputy Police Chief Tom Meloni said.
In addition to the drunken driving count, Banaszewski was charged with endangering the life of a child. She was processed on both charges at the Wheaton Police Department and was released on a recognizance bond.
Meloni would not reveal the children's ages but did say they were all younger than 17.
Mary Gall, region administrator for Mothers Against Drunk Driving, said driving drunk with a child increases the severity of the incident exponentially.
"DUI crashes are devastating in all cases," she said. "You can just imagine that's just aggravated when you're talking about a child. A parent who would be responsible for their own child's death - that would just be devastating to them."
Gall said instances such as this are why child endangerment laws exist.
A man, who did not identify himself, answered Banaszewski's door Wednesday and said, "We have no comment."
Calls to Banaszewski's home were not returned Wednesday.
The DuPage Circuit Court clerk will set Banaszewski's court date.
Scalia has served on the Supreme Court since 1986, when he was nominated by President Reagan. He has nine children.
DIERSEN HEADLINE: VERY SAD: Naperville Sun blasts Naperville Area Republican Women's Organization Candidates Forum
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/napervillesun/news/258125,6_1_NA15_FORUM_S1.article
A candidates forum for the upcoming city, Park District and school district races was hosted by the group Wednesday night - but it appears not all the candidates were invited.
As of Wednesday afternoon, all three mayoral hopefuls and all six City Council candidates had confirmed they would attend the event. However, only three of five Park District candidates and three of nine School District 203 board candidates had confirmed. Not one of the seven Indian Prairie School District 204 candidates was listed.
NARWO President Liz Martinez said there's a logical explanation.
"The mayoral candidates and those running for City Council - that was easy to know who they were," she said. "It was more difficult to know who was running for Park District and the boards of education. Even once we knew who they were, finding them was yet another issue.
"But I believe they have all been invited now," Martinez said Wednesday afternoon.
However, that was not the case with incumbent Park District Commissioner Ron Ory, one of five candidates vying for three seats.
Ory has been a commissioner for 12 years and is listed in the phone book. He did not receive an invitation to the event at his home or at Park District offices.
"If they were trying to contact the candidates for the Park District, I would have thought they would go to the secretary of the board or the person who collects the (election) packets," Ory said.
Lynne Bandyk, Park District executive administrative assistant, said no invitation for Ory or any commission candidates had been received, nor had NARWO made contact about the event.
"They haven't gone out of their way to extend an invite to a few folks," Ory said.
But it appears the group did make a concerted effort to reach some candidates.
Park District candidate Suzanne Hart, who is also listed in the phone book, said she received a call from a NARWO member the last week of January asking her to participate in the forum.
In the past the organization has hosted similar forums for state and county government candidates; this was to be its first venture into nonpartisan local elections.
Martinez said NARWO may make candidate endorsements after the Feb. 26 mayoral primary, but added that is not the purpose of the forum; rather, it is for education.
Tom Wronski, chairman of the Naperville Township Democratic Organization, said members of his group have been asked to help several local candidates and while they may so on an individual basis, it won't be done at an organizational level.
"It's a nonpartisan election and we believe people can and should choose their own representatives in terms of their own neighborhood concerns," he said.
DIERSEN HEADLINE: Democrat and RINO efforts to bring poverty to the suburbs less successful in Naperville
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/napervillesun/news/258331,6_1_NA15_POVERTY_S1.article
While poverty rates in Chicago still far eclipse those in the suburbs, the summit's 2007 Report on Illinois Poverty found that DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, Will and suburban Cook counties fueled poverty growth in the Chicago region since 1999.
There are now 25 percent more suburban residents who live at or below the poverty line than there were six years ago, while Chicago saw an 8 percent increase in poverty rates.
Cook County's poverty rate in 2004 was at 15 percent and rates in surrounding counties were in the 5 percent to 7 percent range, with DuPage at 6 percent.
According the study, two in five of the Chicago region's poor live in the suburbs.
Meanwhile, Naperville's poverty rate sits at 2.5 percent, according to a 2006 Census report. The city also boasts a median household income of $88,771 - far greater than the Illinois median of $50,260.
But Naperville is an exception to the study's findings, which point to statewide increases in income disparity and an increase in poverty in 87 of Illinois' 102 counties.
The study also found that 436,270 Chicago-region residents are defined as living in extreme poverty by earning less than half of the poverty line - a population more than three times the size of Naperville.
Poverty is no longer just an urban problem, said U.S. Rep. Judy Biggert, who is co-chair of the Poverty Summit. The Hinsdale Republican also serves as ranking member of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity.
"Poverty continues to be a challenge, whether it is in the urban, suburban, or rural areas of Illinois," she said. "I'm especially interested in working to increase access to affordable housing for those who need it. I also plan to work in Congress to ensure that homeless kids get the education they need to break out of the bonds of poverty."
The increase in suburban poverty is due to rising housing and transportation costs, lack of adequate health insurance, manufacturing job loss, an increase in teen birth rates in the collar counties and inadequate income support programs, the study found.
Sid Mohn, president of Heartland Alliance, which convened the Illinois Poverty Summit, called for improved and expanded programs in 2007 for low-wage workers, the unemployed and people unable to work.
"Poverty is growing in Chicago's neighboring suburbs and towns and is no longer just an urban problem," he said. "Poverty is a statewide problem, and state and local leaders must work together to take the necessary steps to reduce poverty in every corner of Illinois."
DAILY HERALD
For the first time in history, more poor people are living in the nation's suburbs than in the cities. Soon that may be true in the Chicago area; the number of those living in poverty in the collar counties has risen dramatically since 1999.
More and more suburban residents are barely scratching out a living, a report on Illinois poverty indicates.
More than 386,000 people in the collar counties of DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, Will and suburban Cook are among the have-nots, the study by the Mid-America Institute on Poverty of Heartland Alliance indicates.
And the number of those in need in the suburbs grew by 25 percent between 1999 and 2006, a rate that surpasses Chicago's rate of 8 percent.
"Poverty is a reality, not an urban phenomenon," said report researcher Amy Rynell of Heartland Alliance, a Chicago-based charitable organization.
In Illinois, the numbers of the poor come to 1.48 million, while in Chicago the tally is 573,486.
Heartland uses federal guidelines to define poverty as one person earning less than $10,210 a year or a family of four with an income of less than $20,650.
Experts say the poor are seniors, people with disabilities, domestic violence victims, young adults trying to make it on their own, single-parent families, new immigrants, individuals with health problems, and the unemployed.
They're also people with jobs, say social workers on the front lines.
"They're working hard, holding down two jobs and trying to find child care," explained Victoria Bran, director of the Rolling Meadows Police Neighborhood Resource Center.
The Illinois report echoes a national study by the Brookings Institution that found - for the first time in history - more of America's poor are living in the suburbs than in cities, a total of 1.2 million people in 2005.
Suburban poverty tends to be invisible, a phenomenon Chicago native Bran noticed.
"You come out to the suburbs and see the large homes and properties," she said. "You don't always see the other side."
But it's a reality Winfield resident Laticia Nunes experiences every day.
The mother of three children ages 1, 3 and 5 years carefully looked through items Wednesday at the free-clothes closet at the People's Resource Center in Wheaton.
She picked up a tiny pair of boots and another of shoes to help keep her kids warm.
"I come here when it's necessary," Nunes said.
DuPage charitable organizations such as the People's Resource Center and the homelessness prevention agency Public Action to Deliver Shelter, or PADS, have noticed their numbers climbing. The cold snap and blizzards of late have contributed to the crisis, officials said.
PADS of Elgin Executive Director Dennis Hewitt has also seen an increase in people using the agency's emergency overnight shelters.
Spqr Harris, a 20-year-old taking classes at College of DuPage, is sleeping at DuPage PADS shelters until he gets back on his feet.
"It's not all homeless and lazy," Harris said about PADS clients. "Every person has their own situation."
Harris, who gets around by public transit, preferred the frigid temperatures of last week to Tuesday's snowstorm.
"It's kind of rough. I fell into a puddle yesterday," he said.
As she did the numbers, Rynell said she was concerned the number of impoverished people ages 18 to 29, such as Harris, comes to 330,000 across the state, which can reflect a vicious cycle of poverty.
Other findings were that nearly 24,000 households a month use food pantries in Kane, Will, DuPage, Lake and McHenry counties and that a growing number of people in the Chicago region are paying more than one-third of their income toward rent.
State officials, meanwhile, say that in spite of the grim news, employment is increasing. Between 2005 and 2006, the unemployment rate went from 5.4 percent to 3.9 percent, Illinois Department of Employment Security economist Norman Kelewitz said.
U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin says yes, maybe more people have jobs, but they're not necessarily well-paying jobs.
"Incomes are not rising and the cost of living continues to go up," he said. "Costs for education, energy and health care are continuing to go up."
That's a sentiment shared by Maureen Murphy, association division manager at the Lake County branch of Catholic Charities.
The agency serves between 25,000 and 27,000 people a year and has noticed a dramatic increase in need.
Job losses and a high cost of living are hurting Lake County residents, Murphy said.
"If you work for a minimum wage in Lake, you have to work 133 hours a week to afford a two-bedroom apartment.
"People are trying to stay afloat, but they need extra help," she said.
Darlene Marcusson, executive director of Lazarus House in St. Charles, which assists the homeless, contends the haves must take some responsibility for the plight of the have-nots.
"I appreciate being able to go to Wal-Mart and buy a case of water for $4, and that's the problem. It means someone is working for $8 an hour instead of $18 an hour," Marcusson said.
Heartland's report calls on the Illinois General Assembly to cut the numbers of the poor, assist with affordable housing and expand job training programs.
Second science textbook flagged Dist. 203 board member Jim Caulfield objects to sexual topics - Melissa Jenco
http://www.dailyherald.com/news/dupagestory.asp?id=281271&cc=d&tc=nap&t=naperville
A science textbook is once again creating a stir in Naperville Unit District 203.
School board member Jim Caulfield says he objects to a book awaiting board approval because it contains “politically driven inaccuracies” in the way it addresses contraception and abortion.
“It’s got nothing to do with censorship. It’s got everything to do with what’s a world-class education and this … is on its face misinformation on politically controversially topics,” Caulfield said.
Staff members have recommended the book, “Essentials of Human Anatomy and Physiology,” by Elaine Marieb, for advanced high school science classes. They want to purchase 140 copies for $10,425.
The school board is scheduled to vote on the book along with several dozen others on Tuesday.
Caulfield said it’s the board’s responsibility to carefully review textbooks before voting.
“To me, that’s more than getting a list from the administration and approving them. … It’s more than judging a book by its cover … (or) judging by its title.”
In particular, he’s troubled by the way the science textbook combines discussion of RU-486 abortion pills with contraception and he doesn’t agree with the book’s assertion that the pills have few side effects.
“If death is not a side effect, then that may be right, but the New York Times, which is an abortion rights-supporting newspaper, reported that six women died after taking it,” Caulfield said.
He also said the book’s discussion of the morning-after pill credits abortion provider Planned Parenthood and dehumanizes the life involved by referring to it as a fertilized egg.
Gloria Schor Andersen, president of the local chapter of Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, said she doesn’t believe the author is trying to be deceptive or push an agenda.
“I haven’t seen the textbook, but I’m extremely concerned about censorship, and the biggest thing is it’s censorship of (District) 203 science teachers who picked that textbook and they probably chose it for a reason,” Andersen said.
While they may not agree on the book, both Caulfield and Andersen say they simply want science classes to be about science.
Jodi Wirt, associate superintendent for instruction, said textbook selection is a lengthy process that includes designing courses based on state and national standards and evaluating numerous books to help implement that curriculum.
Wirt said the committee choosing textbooks strives for material that is accurate and helps provide a valuable learning experience.
“The problem with that is everyone brings their own personal experiences to a text, so what might be considered (biased) by one person might not be considered a biased perspective to another,” Wirt said.
Textbooks are put on display at area libraries for 30 days for public review before the board votes on them. Residents traditionally provide very little feedback.
But this is the second time Caulfield has raised objections about a science textbook. In the fall of 2005, he proposed the board remove “Biology: A Guide to the Natural World” from the advanced high school biology classes.
At the time, he said the book took an unbalanced approach on topics including contraception, evolution and stem cell research.
The school board rejected that proposal 5-2 but did agree to create a policy that would give officials a heads-up when issues typically covered in sex education are addressed in curriculum or textbooks.
The school board will discuss the latest round of textbooks when it meets at 7:30 p.m. Tuesday at the district’s administrative center, 203 W. Hillside Road.
DIERSEN HEADLINE: VERY SAD: Daily Herald promotes anti-Bush concert in West Chicago
http://www.dailyherald.com/news/dupagestory.asp?id=281328&cc=d&tc=wch&t=west%20chicago
DuPage group against war to sponsor first concert - Elisabeth MistrettaFor almost five years, they’ve rallied, carried protest signs, organized voters and held vigils.
This Sunday, though, they will use music to spread their message.
DuPage Against War Now will host the “Make Art, Not War” concert at Oasis Café in West Chicago.
Local hip-hop artists will pick up the mic and perform in the anti-war group’s first music-centered event since its inception in 2002. It will feature performances by Chicago-area artists Agents of Change, Twist, Two 1 and Either Way.
Amy Tauchman, co-founder of DAWN, said the all-ages show aims to draw in younger supporters who want to find a place of their own within the cause.
“Part of the point is for everyone to take responsibility for what is happening with our government right now,” Tauchman said. “One way to do that is to reach out to people in the language that they speak — hip-hop — and to reach out to the parents of these people.
“We also hope this event will inspire the other generations, even if they’re hesitant about the noise.”
The show will also feature displays of visual art, and DAWN members hope the event will inspire participants to contribute their time, thoughts and donations.
Since the organization’s inception, DAWN has sponsored protests and vigils, registered 7,000 new voters, initiated film festivals and hosted guests like activist Cindy Sheehan, whose son served in the military and was killed in the war.
In addition to the concert on Sunday, the group will host a screening of “The War Tapes” at 7 p.m. Tuesday at the Glen Ellyn Library, 400 Duane St.
For details on the concert or the screening, visit www.d-a-w-n.org.
Millner and Ramey push to pull plug on West Chicago sales tax - Robert Sanchezhttp://www.dailyherald.com/news/dupagestory.asp?id=281454&cc=d&tc=&t=
Two state lawmakers are committed to lifting a quarter-cent sales tax in West Chicago, despite opposition from the DuPage County water group collecting it.
State Sen. John Millner and state Rep. Randy Ramey have introduced identical legislation in the Illinois Senate and House that would eliminate the DuPage Water Commission’s sales tax in West Chicago.
The supplier of Lake Michigan water levies the quarter-cent sales tax on a countywide basis to pay off its massive system of pipelines and pumping stations.
But city leaders have long argued the town shouldn’t be included because it has a multimillion-dollar plant that treats water drawn from underground wells.
“West Chicago will never be in the DuPage Water Commission,” Millner said. “So why should the residents from that area pay money to the water commission? It’s just not fair to the community.”
But water commissioners say the language of the law gives them concern, and they’re planning to voice their opposition to every state lawmaker from DuPage.
“I’m disappointed that they would move forward with the legislation when we didn’t have a chance to work together to resolve our issues,” Commissioner William Mueller said.
One major concern is West Chicago’s request that the commission return all the tax money it collected from the city since the water treatment plant’s January 2005 opening.
The money, estimated at more than $1 million, could help repay the loan West Chicago needed to build its plant.
But water commissioners are only willing to return the sales tax dollars collected since January 2006. And that offer is only good if the proposed legislation is approved this year.
Millner said he’d consider modifying the legislation to reach a compromise. Still, he believes West Chicago’s request is fair, especially when the water commission has so much surplus cash — more than $100 million — that it’s moving to slash water rates and give big rebates to its customers.
Ramey addressed concerns that the proposed legislation might lead to other municipalities, such as Warrenville and Wayne that don’t get lake water, wanting a similar deal.
The change, he said, only would apply to municipalities that have built and operate their own water system. West Chicago is the only DuPage city that’s done that.
In the meantime, Ramey says he understands why West Chicago is pushing for the elimination of the sales tax.
“If I’m paying for something I don’t use,” he said, “I would try to not pay for it.”
The two terms just don’t seem to mesh, and even when state officials try to improve matters, nothing about the process seems to come easily.
Witness this week’s unveiling of the Illinois executive inspector general’s annual report.
The document from Inspector General James Wright lays some interesting statistics on the table. It tells us, for example, that the inspector general’s office last year received 1,278 complaints on such matters as fraud, misconduct, harassment or waste on the part of state employees in departments under the governor’s control.
It tells us that investigators found evidence to support 64 complaints. It informs us that as a result, 13 state employees resigned, were fired or are in the process of being dismissed. It lets us know that the inspector general — based on findings — referred six cases to the U.S. attorney’s office for possible prosecution.
Good data, as far as it goes. But it doesn’t go far enough.
What sorts of misconduct led to dismissals? In what departments did these employees work? Who were they? Not their names, of course. But were they rank-and-file employees? Supervisors? Department heads? Which departments experienced problems large enough to merit referral to the Justice Department? If that sort of information were included, the report would give residents a better idea of how well ethics laws are working.
Ideally, the inspector general’s report would more closely resemble the annual public access counselor report from Attorney General Lisa Madigan’s office. This document lays out raw numbers, but carries additional punch because it also provides specific examples of how Freedom of Information laws were violated.
Wright has suggested for some time now that laws governing his office be updated to make his work more transparent. Some state legislators, including Sen. Susan Garrett, a Lake Forest Democrat, and Sen. Bill Brady, a Bloomington Republican, agree. They are among those working on such fine-tuning as making more information available through Freedom of Information requests or releasing additional information even without special requests.
One other flaw in the law, as currently written, is that the inspector general may refer cases to Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s highly touted ethics commission only under very narrow circumstances. How narrow? According to the commission’s annual report, not a single case was referred to it last year.
The commission has been handled oddly from its inception. After talking up its importance, Blagojevich delayed making his appointments to the panel for more than half a year after lawmakers voted to establish it. He eventually made quality appointments, including attorney and author Scott Turow, but now the group has little to do because of the tight restrictions on which cases can actually be sent its way.
The whole idea behind creating the commission three years ago was that its independent members would be able to review and act on complaints free of any political filter that might interfere if the matter was handled strictly by the department or agency in which the problem occurred. But the commission can’t very well serve that role if it never gets to see any complaints.
Well aware that their empty calendar is not what anyone envisioned, members of the commission set forth their own set of good ideas in their latest annual report. Among them:
•Any case of employee misconduct serious enough to draw a three-day suspension or more should automatically go before the commission.
•The commission should have a role in approving penalties.
•The commission should have a larger oversight role in ethics training.
Good ideas, all, and ones that lawmakers need to put into effect before another legislative session goes by.
ILLINOIS POVERTY SUMMIT
DIERSEN HEADLINE: Blagojevich administration causes poverty to increase in 85 percent of Illinois Counties
http://media.prnewswire.com/en/jsp/search.jsp?searchtype=full&option=headlines&criteriadisplay=show&resourceid=3402915
Poverty Increases in 85 Percent of Illinois Counties Illinois' Future Threatened by Meager Income Gains for Poor and Middle-Income Families, High Young Adult Poverty, and Persistent State Budget Problems, According to New Report
Eighty-seven of Illinois' 102 counties have seen an increase in poverty, according to a report released today by the Illinois Poverty Summit. Nearly 1.5 million Illinois residents live in poverty -- more than the population of the entire city of Philadelphia, the fifth largest city in the nation.
The report illustrates that many Illinois workers cannot make ends meet. Between the early 1980s and the early 2000s, income increases for low- and middle-income families fell far short of keeping pace with inflation. The poorest fifth of families in the state saw their average income increase approximately $145 per year, from $14,969 to just $18,032 during that two-decade period. Middle-income families saw their average income increase from $41,179 to only $50,032, around $420 per year. Looking ahead, 43 percent of new jobs through 2012 are projected to pay less than $23,650 -- not enough to help families meet basic necessities.
"Every Illinoisan must be ensured the human right to a life free from poverty. Yet, we undermine this right every day in Illinois -- the poorest Illinoisans continue to grow poorer and far too many hardworking low- and middle-income families face serious struggles just to make ends meet," said Sid Mohn, president of Heartland Alliance, the convener of the Illinois Poverty Summit. "In 2007, our state leaders should improve and expand critical programs for low-wage workers, the unemployed, and people unable to work in order to provide better paths toward self-sufficiency."
The report also paints a bleak picture for the future of Illinois' economy. More than 330,000 young Illinois adults ages 18 to 29 are living in poverty -- the highest poverty numbers for that age group in the Midwest. Severely hindering the competitiveness of Illinois' future workforce, approximately 18 percent of Illinois young adults do not have a high school diploma -- second only to Indiana as worst in the midwest. Exacerbating these problems are the quick fixes used to address the state's budget shortfalls, which result in a weakened human services infrastructure, unmet service needs that continue to grow, and deepening public debt.
"Our state's fiscal challenges threaten our ability to reduce poverty statewide. We must work together to expand important programs that support working families," said State Rep. Naomi Jakobsson (D-Urbana).
The 2007 Report on Illinois Poverty documents how Illinois families are experiencing significant hardship. Some of the findings include:
-- Illinois children are 53 percent more likely to be poor than working age adults. Rural child poverty in the state rose 26 percent from 1999 to 2000. Nearly 68 percent of poor children live in families that worked in the last year.
-- Lack of adequate health insurance causes health and financial hardship. More than 430,000 working age, insured Illinoisans incurred health costs not
covered by insurance in 2004 that totaled one quarter or more of their annual earnings. Nearly 55 percent of Illinoisans ages 18 to 64 in extreme poverty completely lack health insurance compared to 16 percent of those not in extreme poverty.
-- Assets such as homeownership often keep families financially secure, yet troubling disparities in wealth exist in Illinois. Illinois renter families have a poverty rate of 28 percent compared to a poverty rate of less than 4 percent for Illinois families who own their homes. White Illinois households have a 515 percent higher median net worth than minority households.
-- There are 57 Illinois counties on the 2007 Poverty Watch or Warning lists. These counties are failing in key areas and need to determine where improvements can be made to combat poverty. County-specific data are available in the report's appendix.
"The economic success of our state hinges largely upon the strength in our communities. Creating an environment which is inclusive to investment and the creation of jobs, in combination with initiatives designed to address those truly in need should be a priority for the General Assembly in 2007," said State Sen. Dale Righter (R-Mattoon). "Achieving these goals without the complicated and confusing 'red tape' that too often accompanies government action is vital."
For the first time, the report offers policy recommendations that state leaders should implement to begin addressing poverty and economic insecurity in Illinois, including:
-- Hold statewide legislative hearings to inform a plan to reduce by half the number of Illinoisans living in extreme poverty by 2015.
-- Expand transitional and vocational job programs to ensure that even the lowest-skilled workers and job seekers can obtain and retain employment.
-- Generate new funding for affordable housing by reforming the real estate transfer tax.
-- Expand the state Earned Income Tax Credit program so low-income workers can keep more of their earnings.
The report will be presented next month at the seventh annual briefing of the Illinois Poverty Summit, a bipartisan group that analyzes poverty trends in Illinois. The summit is staffed by the Mid-America Institute on Poverty of Heartland Alliance, a service-based human rights organization that provides housing, healthcare, human services, and human rights protections to the most poor and vulnerable people in our society.
The report, which includes county-specific data, can be viewed online at: http://www.heartlandalliance.org/maip/research.html
For more information: Ambar Mentor or Hugh McMullen, Valerie Denney Communications, Ph: 312-408-2580 x 25, Cell: 773-343-1481 (Ambar); Ph: 312- 408-2580 x 15, Cell: 740-707-7493 (Hugh)
Amy Rynell or Sid Mohn, Heartland Alliance, Ph: 773-336-6074, Cell: 773- 491-5475 (Amy); Ph: 312-660-1301, Cell: 312-209-1301 (Sid)
Source: Illinois Poverty Summit
CONTACT: Ambar Mentor or Hugh McMullen, +1-312-408-2580 x 25, cell,+1-773-343-1481 (Ambar); +1-312-408-2580 x 15, cell, +1-740-707-7493 (Hugh),both of Valerie Denney Communications;or Amy Rynell or Sid Mohn, +1-773-336-6074, cell, +1-773-491-5475 (Amy);+1-312-660-1301, cell, +1-312-209-1301 (Sid), both of the Heartland Alliance
Web site: http://www.heartlandalliance.org/maip/research.html
Last Saturday a "summit" of conservatives was held. The names seem to be secret and the organization doesn't have a name anymore, so it must heretofore be known as the Secret Summit of the Organization With No Name (SSOOWNN). Now I don't know who was at the SSOOWNN and no one has communicated with me, so I have to rely on scuttlebutt and rumor here. In the interest of all Illinois conservatives knowing what is going on I will take on the responsibility of letting you know so you are ready to submit to the Secret Agenda of the Keepers of the Faith (SAKF), discussed at the SSOOWNN.
It appears their purpose, now remember I am strictly going on rumor here, was to anoint THE conservative spokesman for Illinois. I tremble at the suggestion. Apparently a crowd waited outside that grew during the morning. The Secretly Assembled Anointers (ASS) who's credentials nor the bodies they represent are known, wore red, I am told. You must remember, Saturday was cold. So the assembled in the streets are to be commended for waiting. Eventually the white smoke arose in three puffs! What does this mean wondered a farmer waiting in the streets. A low murmur of rumors and wonderment went through the crowd.
THE ANNOUNCEMENT (TA) is yet to be made, but I can clue you in here. Not one, BUT THREE Keepers of the Conservative Message (KCM) have been anointed. They are now to speak for us all. They will no doubt have some ring or identifying hat or something so that when they go to the legislators or make media appearances they will all be instantly recognizable to the masses so that we will follow in awe. For the Banished Orphan Republican Interlopers Not Groveling (BORING) like me, well we will just have to notify all press to take us out of their Outlook Contact Manager, decline speaking engagements and refer all questions of public policy to the KCM. After all, they have been anointed.
Sometimes being a conservative just gets embarrassing. I think I will become the person formerly known as the Unknown Comic and wear a bag over my head.
RAYMOND TRUE Conservative Caucus names Oberweis, Behrend www.gopillinois.com (2/15/07 News Clips page)
At the second meeting of the Conservative Caucus, moderated by Tom Roeser, held at the White Deer Run County Club, Saturday, February 10th the assembled leaders of conservative entities unanimously picked Jim Oberweis and Bruno Behrend as Spokesman and Deputy Spokesman for the Conservative viewpoints in Illinois Politics. Oberweis, a recent candidate for Governor and CEO of Oberweis Dairy and Behrend, President of the DaVinci Consulting group and a WARS radio personality agreed to accept the positions. They will be responsible for advancing the planks of the National and State Republican Platforms and steering the Republican Party in the directions advocated by the late Ronald Reagan who brought his conservative views to the forefront and changed the balance of power in the world. The Caucus advocated a strong representation of the views that made the Republican party the leader among American voters and agreed that there was a need for a "Contract with Illinois" similar to the one that gained 52 Republican members to the House of Representatives in 1994. That event, engineered by Newt Gingrich showed that voters wanted straight talk, straight marriage and straight births. The push to Sodom and Gomorra, recklessly advocated by the extreme left and the clueless "moderates" within our own Republican ranks has led to a zero Republican presence at the State level and little hope for the future. To have a shameless Republican candidate for Governor who proudly rides on a float in a homosexual parade does not resonate with real Republicans. Also, raving about a Democrat named Obama as a great vote getter is not something that makes true Republicans feel warm and fuzzy. It's time to stand up for the values that gave this nation and state the ability to lead, not follow. In the time ahead the Spokesmen and the Caucus will be developing and advocating ten issues to be included in the "Contract with Illinois." Those who consider themselves conservative theologians are invited to submit issues for consideration, selection and inclusion in the next agenda of the Conservative Caucus. The umbrella organization for our Spokesmen will be the Republican Assembly of Illinois [RAI] and within his selection based on rules agreed to at the January meeting Jim Oberweis becomes the President/Chairman of the RAI. Organizations who had officers/members participating in Saturday's deliberations included the Illinois Center Right Coalition [ICRC], Family Taxpayers Network [FTN], Republican Assembly of Lake County [RALC], TAPROOT, Americans For Truth and United Republican Fund [URF]. Others included individuals selected on the basis of their standing and acceptance within the Conservative Community."
Chicago, IL -- As RFFM.org exclusively reported on in an article published January 16, 2007, titled "Republican Assembly of Illinois (RA-IL) Fails to Appoint Oberweis State Conservative Spokesman / Meeting Draws Ire of Some Pro-Family Leaders," the RA-IL has now accomplished what it failed to do during a January 6th meeting by appointing wealthy businessman Jim Oberweis as the group's chief spokesperson during their latest meeting which was held February 10th. Also, Bruno Behrend was appointed deputy spokesperson during the gathering.
Although the full body of the organization was not present, including representatives of the Republican Assembly of Illinois' west suburban Cook County Chapter, approximately ten individuals selected Oberweis for the position by what can only be called an informal agreement.
"It was a strange experience," said one RA-IL member who attended the meeting, but requested anonymity. "I wasn't even sure what Oberweis had been appointed spokesman of. Was he appointed spokesperson for RA-IL or the entire state? There was no show of hands. There was no ballot counting. It was a vote like no other I've ever seen, closer to a coronation."
Some say no matter what position Oberweis was appointed to, the procedure did not follow any formal rules of order, therefore, the informal vote lacked credibility.
There were three individuals nominated for spokesperson at the February 10th so-called RA-IL conservative caucus: Bruno Behrend, a conservative radio host; Jim Oberweis, CEO of Oberweis Dairies, a perennial Republican candidate; and Joe Morris, a respected conservative political analyst, who did not attend the meeting. Morris was disqualified from consideration for the position because he was not in attendance.
Some others who were present at the meeting included: Tom Roeser, who moderated the get together; Col. Raymond True, Chairman of RA-IL' Lake County Chapter; Jack Martin, Executive Director of RA-IL' Lake County Chapter; Peter LaBarbera, Founder and Executive Director of Americans For Truth; Todd Black, member, Illinois Center Right Coalition; Don Costella; Joe Weigand, a conservative activist; John Bivers of Family Taxpayers Network; former state Senator Al Salvi; Dave Diersen, Editor of GOPUSA Illinois; and Craig Simmons, an attorney at law and political activist.
It is not known what Oberweis' position as RA-IL' chief spokesperson will entail. Some political observers believe his appointment is simply a political mechanism which Oberweis will use in another run for elected office.
"Nothing was made clear as to the duties of Oberweis and Behrend," the anonymous source continued. "Just when and where they would speak for RA-IL and what they would be talking about was also a mystery. The vote was not even unanimous. Obviously, this has the earmarks of politics regarding one man's political agenda. I thought I'd be walking into a room filled with 50 or 60 people representing organizations from across the state, but that wasn't the case."
Though Al Salvi was not available for comment, RFFM.org has learned, during the meeting, the former state Senator and others voiced concerns with the process by which Oberweis was chosen.
EDITOR'S NOTE: RFFM.org received considerable criticism from some members of the Republican Assembly of Illinois (RA-IL) regarding an RFFM.org article published on January 16, 2007 concerning the group's agenda for its January 6th meeting. The RA-IL meeting on February 10, 2007 confirmed and validated RFFM.org's original facts as presented in RFFM.org's January 16th article.
RFFM.org stands by its reporting in the article posted on January 16th [http://www.politicsislocal.com/artman/publish/article_553.shtml] and the article on this page. RFFM.org thanks its readership--which stood by us--and RFFM.org pledges to continue its effort to publish the truth to the very best of RFFM.org's ability.
Cindy Richards, the Cindy Sheehan of the anti-life movement - Jill Stanek
http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2007/02/cindy_richards_.html
Chicago Sun-Times columnist Cindy Richards must surely be considered as much an embarrassment to the anti-life movement as Cindy Sheehan is to the anti-war movement. Richards does her side no favors.
Reason #1: Richards uses Valentines Day as a hook to promote abortion in her column today, tacky to say the least.
Reason #2: In that column, Richards repeatedly demonstrates how abortion exploits women. Someone on her side needs to steer her away from describing in great detail the #1 but least publicly supported reason women abort: as a method of birth control.
Richards paints a romantic picture of flowers, chocolate, dinner and sex tonight followed by a surprise positive pregnancy test in a few weeks.
In reality, even the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute admits 89% of tonight's trysting couples will have used some method of contraception, with about that same percentage of mothers later stating they aborted because it was inconvenient. Women are duped into having casual sex with serious consequences. It should come as no surprise that young, single men are most supportive of abortion.
Reason #3: Richards is proud pro-aborts have "successfully challenged every attempt to place legal limits on abortion in Illinois." That's not actually true. We were able to battle her side off on infanticide. But normally pro-aborts don't publicly promote that they are pro-partial birth abortion, against abortion clinic regulations, and against informed consent, to name three of their extreme positions.
Reason #4: Richards also touts Valentines Day as a day when Illinois teens may become impregnated, and God forbid they have to tell their parents.
Does she really want to go there? In actuality, also according to Planned Parenthood and Guttmacher, 1) the younger the teen, the older the impregnator; and 2) underage girls are most often impregnated by adult men. So after tonight's gift of a lollipop, the most likely scenario is Mr. Sexual Perpetrating Pig will impregnate little 13-year-old girl.
Well, Mr. Pig may force Little Girl to take a morning-after pill to hide the evidence of his crime, but that's a discussion for another time. Richards also supports that.
House Republicans Launch 102 Ideas website; Cross asks public to contribute and get engaged Springfield…Asking citizens to contribute ideas and get engaged in the debate about how to improve Illinois, House Republican Leader Tom Cross announced the creation of a website called www.102illinoisideas.com that is designed to serve as a forum for idea creation and discussion. “We are looking for new, innovative ideas. Failed policies of the past, closed door deal making and legislation from special interest groups have created a culture of cynicism and disengagement,” said Cross. “Illinois will not move forward until government re-engages people in the process. We need real discussion and real debate driven from innovative ideas from real people—from all 102 counties of Illinois.” According to State Representative Bill Mitchell, each year many legislative initiatives are a result of local townhall meetings. Now, the 102 ideas plan will take this local effort statewide. “Illinois families face critical challenges. Families wonder how they can afford college, if they have access to healthcare? It only makes sense to have a dialog with them to see how we can work together to find solutions,” said Mitchell. State Representative Joann Osmond said lawmakers will have access to all the ideas submitted and many may be drafted into legislation. “New ideas being generated from families across Illinois could have a profound impact on how we approach lawmaking,” said Osmond. Cross said the ideas will be posted periodically on the website and will allow for public debate and discussion. “If people want to change the way things are done in Springfield, then we need to change the way we approach generating ideas and engaging the public,” said Cross. “We are excited about this program.”
House Republicans Launch 102 Ideas website; Cross asks public to contribute and get engaged
Springfield…Asking citizens to contribute ideas and get engaged in the debate about how to improve Illinois, House Republican Leader Tom Cross announced the creation of a website called www.102illinoisideas.com that is designed to serve as a forum for idea creation and discussion.
“We are looking for new, innovative ideas. Failed policies of the past, closed door deal making and legislation from special interest groups have created a culture of cynicism and disengagement,” said Cross. “Illinois will not move forward until government re-engages people in the process. We need real discussion and real debate driven from innovative ideas from real people—from all 102 counties of Illinois.”
According to State Representative Bill Mitchell, each year many legislative initiatives are a result of local townhall meetings. Now, the 102 ideas plan will take this local effort statewide.
“Illinois families face critical challenges. Families wonder how they can afford college, if they have access to healthcare? It only makes sense to have a dialog with them to see how we can work together to find solutions,” said Mitchell.
State Representative Joann Osmond said lawmakers will have access to all the ideas submitted and many may be drafted into legislation.
“New ideas being generated from families across Illinois could have a profound impact on how we approach lawmaking,” said Osmond.
Cross said the ideas will be posted periodically on the website and will allow for public debate and discussion.
“If people want to change the way things are done in Springfield, then we need to change the way we approach generating ideas and engaging the public,” said Cross. “We are excited about this program.”
FAMILY TAXPAYERS NETWORK
Sappy Republicans pine to be Obama’s Valentinehttp://www.familytaxpayers.net/article.asp?id=1205
BLOOMINGTON PANTAGRAPH
http://www.pantagraph.com/articles/2007/02/13/news/doc45d230340b264255816806.txt
COLUMBIA, S.C. -- Two key black political leaders in South Carolina who backed John Edwards in 2004 said Tuesday they are supporting Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's bid for the Democratic presidential nomination.State Sens. Robert Ford and Darrell Jackson told The Associated Press they believe Clinton is the only Democrat who can win the presidency. Both said they had been courted by Illinois Sen. Barack Obama; Ford said Obama winning the primary would drag down the rest of the party."It's a slim possibility for him to get the nomination, but then everybody else is doomed," Ford said. "Every Democrat running on that ticket next year would lose - because he's black and he's top of the ticket. We'd lose the House and the Senate and the governors and everything.""I'm a gambling man. I love Obama," Ford said. "But I'm not going to kill myself."Ford said he was swayed by calls from former President Clinton and Hillary Clinton. The Charleston lawmaker said she has solid support in his district, one of the key regions in the state with a major black Democratic voting population.Clinton's campaign said it welcomed the lawmakers' support, but disagreed with Ford's contention that Obama could harm a Democratic ticket. "I think it's just flat-out wrong," said spokesman Mo Elleithee.One Obama ally rejected Ford's assessment."I think that Senator Ford's comments were reprehensible," said Illinois Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. "I believe Democratic prospects would soar, not slump."Darrell Jackson, who also is the minister of a large church in the state's capital city, said Edwards - a South Carolina native who won the state's Democratic primary three years ago - had his chance."I feel as if he's had his opportunity," he said.Darrell Jackson said Edwards was a wonderful individual and he considers Obama a friend, but Clinton "is our best shot."The endorsements come just days before Obama and Clinton campaign in the state for the first time in the 2008 race.Jackson and Ford took credit for turning out black voters for Edwards in 2004 in a state where half the primary voters are black. In his only primary victory, Edwards won 37 percent of the vote, slightly better than Sen. John Kerry.Support from black voters is key in South Carolina, where 49 percent of the Democratic presidential primary vote came from blacks in 2004. The state will host the first Southern primaries for both the GOP and Democrats in 2008.
WORLD NET DAILY
The link between HPV and lung cancer - Jill Stanekhttp://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54236
Gov. Rick Perry is still drawing a barrage of criticism for signing on executive order almost two weeks ago forcing Texan parents to vaccinate their adolescent daughters against the sexually transmitted human papillomavirus.
Perry rationalized, according to the Houston Chronicle, "If the medical community developed a vaccine for lung cancer, would the same critics oppose it, claiming it would encourage smoking?"
I have considered that analogy myself. It is perfect. Lung cancer is predominantly caused by a destructive behavior, cigarette smoking, which also causes a myriad of other health problems.
So to answer Perry's question, everyone would welcome a lung cancer vaccine, but wouldn't turn around and say, "Great, let's all smoke!" Because we know smoking causes other cancers like laryngeal, esophageal, stomach and pancreatic as well as health problems like heart disease and infertility.
Furthermore, this behavior endangers the health of other people who come in contact with the smoker, like babies born with low birth weight.
Interestingly, the most ardent critics of smoking are lawmakers, who have increasingly sought to discourage this destructive behavior by making it more difficult.
HPV is also the consequence of a destructive behavior, sex outside of marriage.
While an HPV vaccination guards against four of over 100 strains of HPV (for four years, anyway), it will do nothing to stop a myriad of other sexually transmitted diseases like chlamydia, syphilis, gonorrhea and trichomoniasis as well as health problems like HIV and infertility.
Furthermore, this behavior endangers the health of other people who come in contact with the STD carrier, like babies born with herpes.
So when renowns like actress Marissa Jaret Winokur and Illinois state Sen. Debbie Halvorson divulged their history of HPV as the basis for conducting a crusade against it, you'd think they would discourage the destructive behavior causing it by talking about it, such as:
But instead of speaking against the cause of HPV, Winokur and Halvorson are instead promoting a vaccination to halt just a tiny fraction of the multitude of consequences of this destructive behavior.
Here is where they erred. After having publicly presented themselves as Exhibit A in this discussion they tried to say, "I have a history of this disease, but my solution excludes assessing the history of my disease." That is illogical and dangerous. As an RN I'll add it is bad medicine.
When I presented the aforementioned topics for discussion on a blog this week, liberals accused me of hate, extremism, personal attacks, venom and vitriol.
I do wish they could develop more than a six-word vocabulary to describe us, or perhaps shorten wasted space by creating an acronym to call us names, like "HEPAVV!" – although that sounds like a new STD they might inadvertently vaccinate themselves against, and then what would they have to say? But I digress.
Actually, it is misguided legislators who are personally attacking the health of our children by mandating they get a vaccine brand new on the market that the FDA acknowledges has not been thoroughly vetted. It's not as if the FDA hasn't approved dangerous meds before, Vioxx to name one.
Back to that lung cancer vaccine, or perhaps an HIV vaccine. I would be happy were those discovered. But I would rebel against the government mandating my child be vaccinated in case she someday took up smoking, became a lesbian or started shooting heroin.
Liberals accuse us of spreading "fear and threat" by discussing the dangers of promiscuity. Their demand for ignorance can be interpreted only one of two ways. Either liberals hold a paternalistic view of women as being too weak to handle the truth, or an exploitive view of women who should remain sex objects no matter the cost to their health. There is no other explanation for hysterical protests against spreading information about the cause of HPV.
The fact is sexually destructive behaviors are important financial and ideological cornerstones of liberalism. The abortion industry and homosexual lobby both funnel huge amounts of money to liberals, and both push the same agenda: complete sexual autonomy with no consequences.
But there were 50 or so waving signs and chanting, “No abortion, no Obama.” Their voices might become a consistent presence as the senator makes his way around the country in his bid to win the White House.
Abortion foes in Illinois, following the lead of registered nurse Jill Stanek, are targeting Obama (D-Ill.) for a number of “present” and “no” votes he cast on anti-abortion legislation during his time in the Illinois state Senate.
It is hardly unusual that a Democratic candidate would receive unfavorable attention from anti-abortion groups. But Stanek and other anti-abortion crusaders in Illinois are targeting Obama because he voted on a package of legislation collectively known as the Illinois Born Alive Infants Protection Act.
The legislation came about after Stanek, then a nurse at Christ Hospital in the Chicago suburb of Oak Lawn, witnessed late-term abortions “where babies were being aborted alive and shelved to die in the soiled utility room” of the hospital, in her words.
Stanek, who said she held one of those infants until it died after about 45 minutes, began reaching out to public officials, testifying before both state and national lawmakers.
From 2001 to 2002, Obama voted either “present” or “no” on the legislation. In his floor speeches at the time, he cited in particular his concerns about the constitutionality of the definition of a “born alive infant” and the inclusion of potential civil and criminal penalties for doctors in these situations. He also warned that the bill might compromise the relationship between a woman and her doctor.
The measure failed in the Illinois statehouse in both 2001 and 2002.
In one speech in the spring of 2001, Obama said he agreed in principle with the need to protect infants, but argued that the measure went too far in its definitions of fetal viability.
“This is an area where potentially we might have compromised and … arrived at a bill that dealt with the narrow concerns about how … a pre-viable fetus or child was treated by a hospital,” Obama said at the time.
At the same time, similar legislation made its way through the federal process and was eventually signed into law by President Bush in August 2002 in Pittsburgh. Stanek, now a columnist for WorldNetDaily.com, attended the signing and was mentioned by Bush.
Separately, a Senate amendment to protect infants born alive during abortion was offered by then-Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) in 2001. It passed the Senate 98-0 with all current Democratic presidential hopefuls who were in the Senate at the time voting in favor, including Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.), Chris Dodd (Conn.), Joseph Biden (Del.) and then-Sen. John Edwards (N.C.).
Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) spoke on the measure on the Senate floor, saying, “I, as being a pro-choice senator on this side, representing my colleagues here, have no problem whatsoever with this amendment.
“I feel good about that,” Boxer said. “I feel good that we can, in fact, vote for this together. It is very rare that we can.”
Obama’s campaign did not return calls for comment, but Pam Sutherland, president of the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council, said the Illinois legislation was misleading and a far cry from the Senate’s legislation. Obama was aware of this difference, she added.
Sutherland noted that every medical group in the state was opposed to the state legislation, which would have opened the door to “civil suits and criminal charges” for doctors and led directly to an overall ban on abortions.
“The legislation was written to ban abortion, plain and simple,” she said. “Sen. Obama saw the legislation, when he was there, for what it was.”
On the narrower issue of “born alive” infants, Sutherland said, Planned Parenthood of Illinois worked last year with the anti-abortion group, the Illinois Federation of Right to Life, to pass legislation that protects infants that survive abortion procedures.
But Stanek said Obama was the only state senator to speak out on the legislation, and his actions there are “just one demonstration of how liberal he is.”
“Everybody in the pro-life movement is completely aware of what Obama stands for — how bad he is,” she said.
Stanek, who was one of the protesters present at Obama’s announcement, said she thinks anti-abortionists “may be more up in arms” over Obama’s positions “than even Hillary Clinton’s” because of “his extreme position” on this specific issue. But she said she knows of no concerted effort to single Obama out for his support of abortion rights.
Joseph Scheidler, the founder of the Chicago-based Pro-Life Action League who helped lead the protests in Springfield last Saturday, took a similar line. He said that while his group “won’t concentrate on Obama,” he wanted to cut through a “ga-ga” media following to ensure that voters know the senator’s position on the issue.
“The others are all very clear about being pro-abortion,” he said. “Obama has been clever enough … to keep voters confused.”
Scheidler said anti-abortion groups around the country would make their presence known at campaign events for the Democratic candidates, and they might not reserve their criticisms for Democrats alone this year.
Scheidler said among the Republican candidates, only Sen. Sam Brownback (Kan.) is “the one we find to be pretty pure.”
He questioned former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney’s “complete turnaround” on the abortion debate and Sen. John McCain’s (R-Ariz.) leadership on the issue. He also described former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani as “a nice guy” who is solidly in support of abortion rights, making him unqualified to lead the country, in his eyes.
REPUBLICANS FOR FAIR MEDIA
Americans For Truth President Peter LaBarbera Says Death Threats From Homosexual Bloggers Will Not Deter Mission - Daniel T. Zanoza
http://www.politicsislocal.com/artman/publish/article_563.shtml
WASHINGTON TIMES
OUTRAGEOUS: National Football League rejects Border Patrol ad - Stephen Dinan and Jerry Seper
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070213-115739-3816r.htm
How is it that our greatest President and the father of the Republican Party can now be relegated in some way inferior to Barack Obama is beyond comprehension. Eric Zorn boasts of the crowds that Barack Obama draws. While I definitely appreciate the personal magnetism of our hometown presidential candidate, perhaps the large crowds are driven by the media’s gushing, non-stop love affair with Barack Obama. Not a day goes by without some major media promotion of Obama in the guise of “news.”
Abraham Lincoln had nothing like that kind of media promotion because of two basic reasons:
With all due respect to Barack Obama, I don’t think it is fair to discuss Abraham Lincoln and Barack Obama in the same sentence. However, since this comparison is now out there due to the bold assertion of the candidate himself and the frenzied, cheerleading of the media, I am compelled to offer comparative differences.
The wide chasm of a difference between Abraham Lincoln and Barack Obama is that Lincoln espoused principled, unpopular positions and stood up to the media of his time. Barack Obama, on the other hand, does not espouse one position that I know of which is not poll-tested. Please, Mr. Zorn, tell me which courageous, unpopular position of Barack Obama’s do you think resembles that of Abraham Lincoln’s? Would it be his position to withdraw from the Iraq War in 08’? Would it be his call to work together and cease the politics of division? Or maybe it is his call to roll back tax cuts on “the rich”? Please help me here, Mr. Zorn.
Barack Obama is a charming young man who has been catapulted into the stratosphere because of a vast media network that wants to make him into something he may not be.
Frankly, the more appropriate comparison of Barack Obama and a past President would be: Barack Obama is today’s Jimmy Carter.
Think about it. 1976, the American public was disenchanted with our leadership in the post Watergate and post Vietnam era. We, Americans, wanted to believe; we wanted a hero and we projected those desires onto a smart, naval academy grad, and peanut farmer from Georgia who had little experience.
Please, Mr. Zorn, respect the legacy of Abraham Lincoln and, at least, wait until Barack Obama takes a courageous, unpopular position before you declare that the Great Emancipator who saved the Union was “no Barack Obama.”
JIM LEAHY
Jim Leahy responds to Paul Green
http://www.illinoisgop.org/ubb/Forum3/HTML/000329.html
What "Professor Green" should ask is ;" Is the GOP in bad shape because of a fight between factions or is the fight between factions because the GOP is in such bad shape?" He seems to think that it is the latter when in fact it is the former.
It has been a 10 year fight and a change of the guard is taking place. It was the GOP itself that brought about the resignation of our own Governor. In the 1998 election the ticket had 3 candidates who claimed conservatism (Life,guns and taxes) and won for the GOP ( Gov G Ryan, US Senate Peter Fitzgerald, AG Jim Ryan) it was the base who turned on George when he raised taxes for IL First, .flipped on Government funding of abortion and backed homosexual rights. It was Peter Fitzgerald who fought the party hacks and imported Pat Fitzgerald to do the job the Democratic combine US attorney would not do. Professor Green cannot understand because he was a friend of George and the combine, and hates conservatism.
Then after the speech in Kankakee when George lashed out at the base, then let every murderer off of death row, and promised to bring the party down with him the powers that run the ILGOP and the conservative movement have been at war. The party always cutting conservative candidates off at the knees, running their own candidates who aren't Republicans (JBT another favorite of the professor) and working to make sure no Outsider ( conservative) would win.
When the GOP offers a candidate who stands for the national platform the people of Illinois will vote for them. Now is the time for the outsiders to band together, get a candidate to run for Senate and show the voters the GOP has been reborn. It is up to us. There won't ever be a better time.
Paid for by David John Diersen