The People's Campaign
Kovach Democrat for Congress
 
 
 
Home
About Tom
Issues
Accountability
Budget Priorities
Economic Message
Economic Message, Part 2
Economic Message, Part 3
Economic Plan
Gas Prices
Good Government
Immigration Policy
Iraq
National Security
Rebuilding Democracy
Campaign Funding
Ethics Reform
Media Reform
Voting Rights
Social Issues
Values
Event Photos
Press Room
Volunteer
Donate
Quarters for Kovach
Adopt a Yard Sign
Calendar
Survey
Community Partners
Web Affiliates
Contact Us
Take Action!
 
Subscribe to Newsletter
Email:
 
 

American Economic Realities

 

The national income, or Gross Domestic Product (GDP), is the main measure of a nation’s economic success.  Since 1970, the national income of the United States has more than tripled: that fact alone is reason enough for our leaders to rejoice. 

 

But has that gain in national income benefited most Americans?  Who has contributed to that growth?  What has happened to us and our families as a result of the increase in our collective income?  Have all Americans shared in this growth?  Have American families prospered as a result of being American? 

 

Household income: To answer these questions, let’s start with a reasonable yardstick in determining whether or not families are better off: median family income.  Median family income is a measure of the middle group of family income; it means that as many make above the number as make it below.  When someone says “middle class,” this is what they mean by “middle.” 

 

Unfortunately, the news on this figure for the last 36 years is not good, but that would not be news to most of you.  Despite what the media tells you, the average household income, overall, is not as good as it was for middle class Americans 36 years ago.

Any Economics 101 class will teach you that in order to compare incomes from differing years, we must correct for inflation.  We all know a dollar in 1970 bought a great deal more than a dollar in 2005.  So, taking the inflation rates from each year into account, income from different years has to be corrected to a single year’s value, so we can compare apples to apples.  In the graph above, we see the 30 year trend has not been very favorable, showing an increase in family income of a little over 20% over the same time frame that national income has nearly tripled. 

Any Economics 101 class will teach you that in order to compare incomes from differing years, we must correct for inflation.  We all know a dollar in 1970 bought a great deal more than a dollar in 2005.  So, taking the inflation rates from each year into account, income from different years has to be corrected to a single year’s value, so we can compare apples to apples.  In the graph above, we see the 30 year trend has not been very favorable, showing an increase in family income of a little over 20% over the same time frame that national income has nearly tripled. 

You may well ask, “How then, have family incomes increased?”  But most of you know this answer as well.  The slightly positive change in family economics is largely a result of the second income-earning spouse.

You might now think, “Well, all this may be true, but I never really felt my standard of living slip.  I feel, at least a little bit, like I’m doing better than my parents did!”  Sadly, the answer to that one is: not really.  You see, American families have coped, but only by sacrificing their future, much the way our federal government does it, by borrowing more and saving less.  The difference is, most Americans don’t have a choice! 

(continued)

 
Paid for by Kovach for Congress